Saturday, February 14, 2009Y
HAPPY HEARTS! <3's
Okayyy,
Valentine's day, as in from some commercial or a tv segment which i couldnt really remember the name that ive watched, is the day the most loveeey doeey cards are sent. Accordingly, it even tops christmas season-- though a friend of mine says it is just second to the yuletide. Anyhow, since i cant even remember on what segment i've watched that that makes me an unreliable source. so what the heck. be critical yet dont judge me wrongly. uhmm, research maybe?
Point is HOW COME i havent got one?
HAHA!
i realized a thought after reading a friend's post and after having some reflections on those things ive said about someone and about love--alyn and mine's discussion over the valentine's
Love. How could i forget. It is the most ambiguous, the most loose and overly used term. Admittedly, even i have used and abused the word in a way that i really shouldnt have. like, i have posts about feelings of 'love' for this certain person and then another post for this other person. To mention, i have similar posts in my previous blogs. if i am to describe those posts from a point of view of a friend, ROSEANNE, those would nonetheless be CHEESY and MUSHY.
(and roseann do the honor of adding adjectives)
maybe IM just ASSUMING, as my friend, alyn has said it.
but really how would one know what is assuming and what is genuine feeling?
honestly, i have never really been in love. that was what i was trying to say to alyn, but for some reasons, she wont believe me. Perhaps it was because she is my friend and she has heard my
'heartaches and all' when we were in high school.
Seriously, i cant even believed that i have been in love. I mean, looking back, i do remember having the feeling but was that feeling really love? Maybe back in high school, i was just as engrossed as everyone else is with the cliche topic of love that i have been forced to think that i was in love.
LOVE, is not really felt by the heart but by our brain. It is not really our heart that feels.
Stupid. someone who uses the line 'i love you with all my heart' should go back to basic biology. The correct technical term would be 'i love you with all my hypothalamus'.
The heart pumps blood and just that, it doesnt have any receptors for feelings.
And i am being a ridiculous again. i know -- ILY with all my heart is figuritave. So, peace! Back to my argument.
Since there was no conrete proof of me being in love besides those unsent cheessy and never published letters and poems which couldnt really be valid proofs, and since no committed relationship or whatsoever had been formed or in other words what i have felt was just a one way and never really reciprocating...therefore, i am a clean slate when it comes to love. hehe.
illogical maybe. but why do you care?
As Gabriel Garcia Marquez puts it, Love when it passes cannot be
recollected as
love but as something else.
there.
oh WRONG! that just happens to falsify my argument.
LOVE when it passes, cannot be recollected as LOVE but as something
else.
that which cannot be recollected as such is still termed as love.THEREFORE, I'M WRONG.CRAP. DONT MIND ME!
Labels: personal
12:44 PM
